<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/c0199066b50b442b98554c5573122c51&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1086&quot; height=&quot;814&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>814</height><width>1086</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>814</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1086</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/c0199066b50b442b98554c5573122c51-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>144</duration><title>SAT Jan 2018_S1_Q28/Q29</title><description>p:  Based on the passage, which choice best describes the relationship between salt behavior in the nanoworld and in the macroworld? , and  Which choice provides the best evidence for the answer to the previous question? 
a:  In both the nanoworld and the macroworld, salt can be flexible. ;
 Salt flexibility is expected in the nanoworld but is surprising in the macroworld. ;
 Salt nanowires were initially observed in the nanoworld and later observed in the macroworld. ;
 In the nanoworld, salt’s interactions with water lead to very different properties than they do in the macroworld. ;  Lines 12-13 (“Maybe . . . think”) ;
 Lines 22-24 (“Surface . . . scale”) ;
 Lines 39-42 (“The initial . . . speculate”) ;
 Lines 51-53 (“Huge . . . scales”) ;</description></oembed>