video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/cb2373f7d2c24fd08513e559aeac39d6" frameborder="0" width="1280" height="960" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>9601280Loomhttps://www.loom.com9601280https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/cb2373f7d2c24fd08513e559aeac39d6-ecbaad26c9afc3a4.gif912.98This Loom explains a Flight Base design challenge focused on how operators make decisions during live drone incident response. The author argues that the operator is not a pilot but a decision maker: in phase 1 the operator is the judge while AI accesses the threat before they see it, in phase 2 they become the commander with a map-first interface and confirm or coverage actions, and in phase 3 they become the archivist as evidence is captured automatically and reviewed afterward. The incident scenario runs for 4 minutes and 12 seconds with one operator, and the UI uses AI to generate situation guidance and a team brief. The Loom also describes evidence packaging for three audiences, including a chain of custody certificate for police, and notes the design as an add-on to an existing live response library.