<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/ccde91207d1841dfbace4b30ed343244&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1038&quot; height=&quot;778&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>778</height><width>1038</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>778</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1038</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/ccde91207d1841dfbace4b30ed343244-00001.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>222</duration><title>S1 Q25 SAT #3</title><description>p:  In the second paragraph (lines 12-32), the incident involving the local rancher mainly serves to 
a:  reveal Ken Dial’s motivation for undertaking his project. ;
 underscore certain differences between laboratory and field research. ;
 show how an unanticipated piece of information influenced Ken Dial’s research. ;
 introduce a key contributor to the tree-down theory. ;</description></oembed>