video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/d276695f63d74a44902db9e07a2454cd" frameborder="0" width="1920" height="1440" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>14401920Loomhttps://www.loom.com14401920https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/d276695f63d74a44902db9e07a2454cd-c38ac841913b0bab.jpg158.467This Loom explains why attorneys must directly review cited facts and law before filing pleadings to avoid Rule 11 sanctions. It notes that in 2026 courts have taken a harder line after multiple sanctions cases involving both federal and state courts, including penalties for AI-related errors beyond hallucinated case law, such as fabricated deposition quotes, fake citations, and non-existent sources. The speaker promotes Clear Brief as a site-checking platform that scans Word documents without generative AI, supports pulling cases via partnerships, can run analyses on opponent briefs, and can generate site check reports. They close by suggesting viewers can email hello@clearbrief.ai or test Clear Brief via the Microsoft AppSource Store.