video1.0<iframe src="https://www.loom.com/embed/d5dcdbbd0b8748c5a7ef0ab550b26a2b" frameborder="0" width="1920" height="1440" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>14401920Loomhttps://www.loom.com14401920https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/d5dcdbbd0b8748c5a7ef0ab550b26a2b-2a9ee607d77eb553.gif251.27This Loom compares SugarWord’s workout tracking with PRZL for more accurate percentage-based weight training. The author says SugarWord’s 80 percent squat and 75 percent press can be wrong because its 1RM history may use a max hit in November 2023, showing 355 even though later they did 275 for 3 in December and were closer to about 315. They demonstrate PRZL’s smart training max, which uses recent lifts, so 80 percent corresponds to 275 for 5 reps. They also show using more than three weight boxes during warmups to log ramp-up sets and then view session load and volume, such as about 3,000 pounds, versus prior sessions.