<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/d685af71f64a4adf9d7845f978005106&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1460&quot; height=&quot;1095&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1095</height><width>1460</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1095</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1460</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/d685af71f64a4adf9d7845f978005106-f77b1848df914d5b.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>448.383</duration><title>Evaluating Industry Assigned Sample Reports</title><description>In this video I walk through how SMRs, industry assigned sample reports, are evaluated. I submit a scheduled report with intentionally incomplete and incorrect sampling data to show how a Non conformances tab appears and how issues are flagged as violations or exceptions based on a compliance toggle. I also show how retracting a report removes conformance results until resubmitted, and how pass through reports from late submissions create automated non conformances. Evaluation happens at submission time, and the system enforces timeliness, sampling specs, and unit conversions. There is no action requested from viewers.</description></oembed>