<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/da166ae7667f4bc495b21eb5edebfdef&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1670&quot; height=&quot;1252&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1252</height><width>1670</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1252</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1670</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/da166ae7667f4bc495b21eb5edebfdef-7cf6ed3aae8408da.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>2025.344</duration><title>Opus 4.8 vs Sonnet 4.6: Slide Deck for YE Financials</title><description>This Loom compares Opus 4.8 and Sonnet 4.6 on creating a slide deck from 2025 year-end financials for Cactus Blossom using the same brand skill and a light background. Both models produced clean, presentable PowerPoints in under 10 minutes, with Sonnet including metrics like $83,179 net income and sections such as revenue by channel, monthly trends, and 2026 focus areas. The creator found Opus delivered noticeably stronger financial analysis and more detailed slide coverage, and finished about 5 minutes faster, while Sonnet did not appear to perform live research for industry benchmarks. The discussion concludes that Sonnet may be better for day-to-day efficiency due to lower usage, but Opus can outperform when deeper analysis is needed.</description></oembed>