<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/df58973a469d4a04b0f18240156085cf&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;768&quot; height=&quot;576&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>576</height><width>768</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>576</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>768</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/df58973a469d4a04b0f18240156085cf-1b1b24bda8c4837c.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>622.267</duration><title>Mapping Company Account Hierarchies in Clay</title><description>This Loom explains how to map company account hierarchies using Clay IDs to identify parent and subsidiary relationships for CRM and prospecting. It walks through running an Enrich Account Hierarchies enrichment in a workflow starting from the “Chris Ming Test” segment, using the Clay Company ID and returning immediate or ultimate parents plus subsidiaries (with a limit of 20), then writing results back and reviewing failures where no hierarchy data is available. It demonstrates using table view and the search filter “hierarchy status” to switch between ultimate parent and subsidiaries, reducing results from roughly 48 million companies to about 39,000. It recommends taking subsidiary companies found this way and checking them against what is already in audiences or the CRM to add unknown accounts with Clay IDs.</description></oembed>