<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/e5b70845862f4766896df8d85af81516&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1726&quot; height=&quot;1294&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1294</height><width>1726</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1294</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1726</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/e5b70845862f4766896df8d85af81516-9ab642d17f007c72.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>175.91</duration><title>QA Review: Happy Paths and Edge Cases in Workflow 🚀</title><description>In this video, I walk through some QA points, focusing on the Happy Paths and Edge Cases of our system, specifically with Claude and OpenCode. I demonstrate how the working indicators change based on permission requests, highlighting the hierarchy of statuses from green to red. I also touch on some edge cases that arise when managing permissions and indicators at the workspace item level versus the tab level. There is a noted bug with OpenCode that I plan to revisit if time allows. Please take a look at the edge cases I mentioned and let me know if you have any insights.</description></oembed>