<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/e94d6926a0f541a9ac09cc8e84f6220b&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/e94d6926a0f541a9ac09cc8e84f6220b-d7b64f87d4d63564.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>301.425</duration><title>MPF TTT - AAI Hallucinations Citing SOP - Final</title><description>In this video, I discuss a recent incident where a large U.S. law firm, Gordon Reece Scully, faced embarrassment due to AI-generated errors in a bankruptcy court filing, resulting in over $55,000 in attorney and legal fees. This highlights the growing issue of AI hallucinations in legal documents, as we now track 487 cases of such occurrences. I emphasize the importance of auditing AI-generated drafts, as lawyers must transition from simply drafting to ensuring accuracy and reliability. I urge all firms to implement a site-checking policy and ensure comprehensive training on AI risks. Remember, while generative AI can save time, human oversight is crucial at every stage of the process.</description></oembed>