<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/f0a4903bff7f4986ba344dbda5404b99&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1872&quot; height=&quot;1404&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1404</height><width>1872</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1404</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1872</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f0a4903bff7f4986ba344dbda5404b99-7493ac91fe467d70.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>369.746</duration><title>Specialty Review VS Eva Interprofessional Systems Review</title><description>In this video, I discuss the importance of taking a system approach to enhance the quality and thoroughness of medical care reviews and their role in the litigation process. Unlike typical specialty reviews that only cover 10 to 20% of care, our EVA system-level reviews examine the broader systems and processes that led to the healthcare outcomes in focus, identifying up to 90% of invisible systems issues. I emphasize that understanding these systemic drivers is crucial for successful medical malpractice, personal injury or wrongful death cases, as oversights can significantly impact outcomes. I encourage viewers, whether representing plaintiffs or defense to consider the benefits of our comprehensive approach and how it can lead to more thorough and trusted medical care reviews that help you achieve your goals.</description></oembed>