<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/f3b4664ac5714b2c8a105a0235976f33&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;3840&quot; height=&quot;2880&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>2880</height><width>3840</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>2880</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>3840</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f3b4664ac5714b2c8a105a0235976f33-05b2abe9656bfe9a.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>52</duration><title>🦋</title><description>This Loom explains how Clavio flows often fail to work as one complete system, leaving money on the table. The author notes that even with strong existing Klaviyo flow revenue, most accounts were not designed to coordinate, so emails only appear to work together. They use the scenario of a customer abandoning their car, then purchasing anyway, to question what happens next across abandoned cart endings, welcome flow, post purchase, browse abandon, and added to cart. They position the “Flow Easy Life Cycle System” as the solution for marketers who cannot confidently answer how these flows interact.</description></oembed>