<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/f3d2e099873d4a0f8c0ca91e1d369900&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1920&quot; height=&quot;1440&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1440</height><width>1920</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1440</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1920</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f3d2e099873d4a0f8c0ca91e1d369900-4e387084f321250e.gif</thumbnail_url><duration>166.494</duration><title>Feature Engineering</title><description>In this video, I discuss the importance of using weight of evidence for categorical variables in fraud detection. I explain how this method helps us avoid overfitting by providing a numerical encoding associated with fraud ratios. It&apos;s crucial that we perform these calculations solely on the training set to prevent data leakage. I also emphasize the need to maintain the integrity of unseen data for accurate model performance. Please take note of this approach as we move forward.</description></oembed>