<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><oembed><type>video</type><version>1.0</version><html>&lt;iframe src=&quot;https://www.loom.com/embed/f76555e470dd449593da7b9057b7a745&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; width=&quot;1728&quot; height=&quot;1296&quot; webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</html><height>1296</height><width>1728</width><provider_name>Loom</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.loom.com</provider_url><thumbnail_height>1296</thumbnail_height><thumbnail_width>1728</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_url>https://cdn.loom.com/sessions/thumbnails/f76555e470dd449593da7b9057b7a745-2dea7801daa7ab6f.jpg</thumbnail_url><duration>1685.0487</duration><title>A response to Bisq Easy Mobile discussion #2665</title><description>In this video, I respond point-by-point to Henrik&apos;s Aug 21st 2024 &quot;Bisq Easy Mobile&quot; discussion thread, arguing the case for the &quot;Thin client model&quot; option.</description></oembed>